|
|
Carl Friedrich Gauss referred to mathematics as "the Queen of the
Sciences".1 If one considers science to be strictly about the
physical world, then mathematics, or at least pure mathematics, is
not a science. Karl Popper believed that mathematics was not
experimentally falsifiable and thus not a science. An alternative
view is that certain scientific fields (such as theoretical physics)
are mathematics with axioms that are intended to correspond to
reality. In fact, the theoretical physicist, J. M. Ziman, proposed
that science is public knowledge and thus includes mathematics. [1]
In any case, mathematics shares much in common with many fields in
the physical sciences, notably the exploration of the logical
consequences of assumptions. Intuition and experimentation also play
a role in the formulation of conjectures in both mathematics and the
(other) sciences. As experimental mathematics continues to grow in
importance within mathematics, and computation and simulation play
an ever bigger role in both the sciences and mathematics, the
objection that mathematics does not utilize the Scientific Method
becomes weaker and weaker. |
Mathematicians
The opinions of mathematicians on this matter are varied. While
some in applied mathematics feel that they are scientists, those in
pure mathematics often feel that they are working in an area more
akin to logic and that they are, hence, fundamentally philosophers.
Many mathematicians feel that to call their area a science is to
downplay the importance of its aesthetic side, and its history in
the traditional seven liberal arts; others feel that to ignore its
connection to the sciences is to turn a blind eye to the fact that
the interface between mathematics and its applications in science
and engineering has driven much development in mathematics. One way
this difference of viewpoint plays out is in the philosophical
debate as to whether mathematics is created (as in art) or
discovered (as in science). It is common to see universities divided
into sections that include a division of Science and Mathematics,
indicating that the fields are seen as being allied but that they do
not coincide. In practice, mathematicians are typically grouped with
scientists at the gross level but separated at finer levels.
Experimental mathematics
Experimental mathematics is sometimes said to mean the
application of the experimental part of the scientific method to
mathematics, where mathematicians develop hypotheses before
attempting proofs, and then see if their calculations are consistent
or inconsistent with their hypotheses. An inconsistency effectively
disproves an hypothesis, by providing a counterexample; consistency
suggests that it is worthwhile to attempt to prove the hypothesis
rigorously.
Although chaos theory and fractals led to an increased emphasis on
experimental mathematics beginning around the 1970s, following the
work of Edward Lorenz and Benoit Mandelbrot, mathematicians have
always done this, and so this is nothing new. Thus experimental
mathematics is used in common parlance among mathematicians to refer
to a special kind of experimentation, using computers to investigate
a large number of cases, or perform computations that are difficult
to do by hand. It is fair to say that the use of computers in this
manner (not to be confused with automated theorem proving) has
become more accepted over time by the mathematical community as a
worthy Endeavour. Indeed, some well-respected journals have begun
accepting papers that are largely consisting of experimental
mathematics, and there is even a journal devoted entirely to it.
Scientific method
Scientific method refers to a body of techniques for the
investigation of phenomena and the acquisition of new knowledge of
the natural world, as well as the correction and integration of
previous knowledge, based on observable, empirical, measurable
evidence, and subject to laws of reasoning. Although specialized
procedures vary from one field of inquiry to another, there are
identifiable features that distinguish scientific inquiry from other
methods of developing knowledge. Specific hypotheses are formed to
propose explanations for natural phenomena and experimental studies
test the predictions for accuracy in order to make increasingly
dependable predictions of future results. Hypotheses in a given
field of inquiry are logically bound together by a wider theory that
assists researchers in forming new hypotheses, as well as in placing
groups of specific hypotheses into a broader context of
understanding.
Among other facets shared by the various fields of inquiry is the
conviction that the process must be objective so that the scientist
does not bias the interpretation of the results or change the
results outright. The scientific method also may involve attempts,
if possible and appropriate, to achieve control over the factors
involved in the area of inquiry, which may in turn be manipulated to
test new hypotheses in order to gain further knowledge.
|