|
|
Mathematics is not a closed intellectual system, in which everything
has already been worked out. There is no shortage of open problems.
Pseudo mathematics is a form of mathematics-like activity undertaken
outside academia, and occasionally by mathematicians themselves. It
often consists of determined attacks on famous questions, consisting
of proof-attempts made in an isolated way (that is, long papers not
supported by previously published theory). The relationship to
generally-accepted mathematics is similar to that between
pseudoscience and real science. The misconceptions involved are
normally based on:
misunderstanding of the implications of mathematical rigor; attempts
to circumvent the usual criteria for publication of mathematical
papers in a learned journal after peer review, often in the belief
that the journal is biased against the author; lack of familiarity
with, and therefore underestimation of, the existing literature. |
Arithmetic Computation
The case of Kurt Heegner's work shows that the mathematical
establishment is neither infallible, nor unwilling to admit error in
assessing 'amateur' work. And like astronomy, mathematics owes much
to amateur contributors such as Fermat and Mersenne.
Mathematics is not accountancy. Although arithmetic computation is
crucial to accountants, their main concern is to verify that
computations are correct through a system of double-checks. Advances
in abstract mathematics are mostly irrelevant to the efficiency of
concrete bookkeeping, but the use of computers clearly does matter.
Mathematics is not numerology
Mathematics is not numerology. Numerology uses modular arithmetic
to reduce names and dates down to numbers, but assigns emotions or
traits to these numbers intuitively or on the basis of traditions.
Mathematical concepts and theorems need not correspond to anything
in the physical world. In the case of geometry, for example, it is
not relevant to mathematics to know whether points and lines exist
in any physical sense, as geometry starts from axioms and postulates
about abstract entities called "points" and "lines" that we feed
into the system. While these axioms are derived from our perceptions
and experience, they are not dependent on them. And yet, mathematics
is extremely useful for solving real-world problems. It is this fact
that led Eugene Wigner to write an essay on The Unreasonable
Effectiveness of Mathematics in the Natural Sciences.
Mathematics is not about unrestricted theorem proving, any more than
literature is about the construction of grammatically correct
sentences. However, theorems are elements of formal theories, and in
some cases computers can generate proofs of these theorems more or
less automatically, by means of automated theorem proverbs. These
techniques have proven useful in formal verification of programs and
hardware designs. However, they are unlikely to generate (in the
near term, at least) mathematics with any widely recognized
aesthetic value.
Pseudo mathematics
Pseudo mathematics is a form of mathematics-like activity
undertaken primarily by non-mathematicians. The word is adapted from
the term pseudoscience, which is applied to ideas that purport to be
scientific but are not. People who practice pseudo mathematics are
sometimes called pseudo mathematicians. Pseudoscience is a term
commonly applied to any body of knowledge, methodology, or practice
that is portrayed as scientific but diverges substantially from the
required standards for scientific work or is unsupported by
sufficient scientific research.
The term "pseudoscience" appears to have originated around 1844 as a
combination of the Greek root pseudo, meaning false, and the Latin
scientia, meaning knowledge or a field of knowledge. It generally
has negative connotations because it asserts that things so labeled
are inaccurately or deceptively described as science. As such, those
labeled as practicing or advocating a "pseudoscience" typically
reject this classification..
|